I think the tests are killing us.
Instead of EQAO (Education Quality and Accountability Office) they should be called SCALL (Scrap Creativity and Love of Learning) or LMAOC (Let’s Make Automatons Out of our Children).
I won’t even get into the cost of writing the tests, printing them, mailing them, hiring hundreds of teachers to mark them, putting said teachers up in hotels and feeding them…
What’s more important is how the test is used to rate schools, teachers, principals and boards. And how that rating translates into teaching to the test. How teaching to the test removes authenticity from learning.
Instead of learning from Finland and their system based on equity, we seem to look to the US – a system based on competition. Equity seems to be working out better for everyone – so let’s learn from them.
Finland consistently score high on the OECD Pisa test – The US – not so much. Canada has had a good showing but that may be a thing of the past as we continue to become more and more standardized test centric – at least it seems we are in Ontario.
There is no word for accountability in Finnish. Interesting.
What really bothers me is what I see. All teachers have to teach the same reading strategies at the same time. The joy of reading is lost when analyzing strategies takes over. See this report by People for Education, ironically it uses EQAO data to show that children’s enjoyment of reading has steadily decreased since the test was implemented.
Writing is so structured there is almost no room for creativity at all. Every task has to be assessed over and over. The fun is beaten out of writing.
Old EQAO tests are printed off and used as teaching materials. It becomes the program.
It’s boring. It’s not learning how to learn, it’s learning how to beat the test and make your school look good. Most teachers hate it. Not because they are afraid to be judged but because it hurts their students. I’m doing my best to keep it interesting.
Silkwood’s educational program is uniquely student-centred and developmental. ‘Student-centred’ means we judge successful teaching by the students’ engagement; ‘developmental’ means the child’s journey from the magic of early childhood to the argumentative world of adolescence is supported by carefully prepared learning experiences tailored to respond to specific age groups. Silkwood’s pedagogy combines spiritual, intellectual, emotional and physical dimensions of learning, offering a truly integrative approach.
That’s what I’m talking about! Wow.
This is what has to change. Formal academic education needs to be richer and more dynamic to engage human intelligence.
Please tell me what is happening in your school. Does the program revolve around the test?
I won’t let it get me down though. As they say on Galaxy Quest: